Metering and Packaging (2)

<

Large enterprise quantitative packaging management is better
A total of 672 enterprises were selected for this special spot check, of which 87 were large-scale enterprises and accounted for 13% of the total number of spot checks. The average sampling pass rate was 93.33%; 233 medium-sized enterprises had an average pass rate of 87.1%; 352 small-scale enterprises. Accounted for 52.7% of the total number of spot checks, and the average sampling pass rate was 78.2%. From the results of random inspections, the measurement management of large-scale enterprises has been continuously strengthened, and the qualified rate of spot checks has risen steadily. This is mainly due to the emphasis placed by large-scale enterprises on the measurement of quantitatively-packaged goods, the establishment of measuring instruments, the establishment of quantitative packaged goods monitoring programs, and the establishment of quantitative quantities. Packaging product sampling system. SMEs' quantitative packaging measurement work is poor, but the measurement management gap with large-scale enterprises is gradually narrowing, especially the measurement management level of medium-sized enterprises is improving rapidly. This random inspection was scientific and reasonable, basically reflecting the measurement management level of various types of quantitatively packaged goods manufacturing enterprises.
Some enterprises have poor quantitative packaging management
The first is poor measurement consciousness, measurement awareness, and quantitative management awareness of quantitative packaged goods needs to be further strengthened. Second, the manufacturing enterprises know very little about the relevant measurement regulations for quantitatively packaged goods, especially the lack of understanding of the allowable deviation of the net content of the quantitatively packaged goods and the statutory requirements for labeling the net content. Third, the facilities are backward, the accuracy of the measurement equipment used for quantitative packaging by the enterprise is low, and the measurement instruments are not subjected to periodic inspections, resulting in an excessive measurement of the net content of quantitatively packaged goods and a decrease in the qualified rate of the measurement of packaged goods.
Quantitative packaging metering failure reasons
Since 1995, China has successively promulgated the “Regulations for the Measurement of Quantitatively Packaged Commodities” and the “Regulations for the Supervision of Quantitative Packing Commodity Measurements” in order to regulate the market order and protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. However, some manufacturers are taking this lightly, and the phenomenon of shortage of goods for quantitative packaged goods still occurs. To eradicate this illegal act, it is necessary to stop the source closure first, and it is necessary to launch the entire society. The reasons for the unqualified products for quantitative packaging mainly include the following points.
Lack of measurement consciousness
The accumulation of quantitative deviations in quantitatively packaged goods produced by enterprises in large quantities is a very large number. In the fierce market competition, negative deviations may seem negligible and may sometimes be the determinants of market success or failure. Some companies use it to make profits because it causes losses. For example, the person in charge of production and the quality inspection personnel of individual companies do not know the “Regulations” mentioned above, or have little knowledge of the above “Regulations”, or have a weak sense of measurement, and have not formulated or strictly implemented management systems such as production process control, product spot check and inspection. The measurement of the products of these enterprises is generally not guaranteed, and the quantity of quantitatively packaged goods is mostly low, and the qualification rate is extremely low.
Incorrect corporate standards
Some enterprise standards stipulate the average deviation of the net content of bulk packaged products, which violates the above-mentioned requirements of the "Supervision Regulations" for the average deviation of batch products. For example, the net content of beer is marked as 640 ml, and individual enterprise standards stipulate that the average net filling content of 630 ml is qualified, and 630 ml is used as the central value to control production. In this way, the net content of packaged goods (products) is mostly negative. Even 630ml can not reach, far from the required standards.
Packaging label is not allowed
China's Provisions for the Measurement and Supervision of Prepackaged Commodity Measurements require that the net content be composed of Chinese, digital, and legal measurement units. There is no explicit requirement for labeling errors. Some of the company's products are marked with errors. Some companies’ products have been marked with errors, and individual companies have been incorrectly labelled for errors because they do not know the “Regulations” or do not understand the relevant requirements of the “Regulations”. In one case, the labeling error exceeds the allowable negative deviation of the “Regulations”, such as “net content: 30g±5g”, in which the error of -5g is seriously beyond the allowable negative deviation in the “Regulations” to be 9% (ie 2.7g) requirements. Second, the labeling error is less than the provisions in the "Regulations", such as the label "net content: 500ml ± 5ml" (the "regulation" allows a negative deviation of 15ml). ±5ml is the control standard used by enterprises for production. The error standard for the net content of general production standards of enterprises is several times stricter than the “Regulations”. Because individual companies lack understanding of the “Regulations”, the production standards are marked on the packaging. Objective reasons do not meet this standard and cause consequences.
Improper use of metering equipment
The improper selection and use of metering equipment and calibration metering equipment for product packaging caused the unqualified measurement of the net content of quantitatively packaged products. For example, a small food factory with a resolution of 10g package tolerance 4.5g product packaging, its net content is difficult to meet the standard requirements. Another example is a scale with a range of 500kg and a division value of 200g as the standard, and an electronic packaging scale with an index value of 20g is adjusted. This obviously cannot guarantee the accuracy and reliability of the package measurement. Some companies have misunderstandings in the verification and use of measuring instruments. For example, newly purchased measuring instruments are qualified at the factory and do not require verification; or the verification is regarded as routine, as long as the certificate does not look at the results; or it does not understand the correction. The net content of packaged goods is insufficient. (To be continued)

Monitoring Meter Series

Car Voltage Meter,Car USB Charger,Voltage Meter

Mosquito Trap,Animal Repeller Co., Ltd. , http://www.chinapestrepeller.com